Cubbon Park Coolness
There was a vintage bike owners' meet-up at Cubbon Park that i stumbled upon this morning.
Om Ashram
The last thing i remember him telling me was, "Go to the udupi mess and tell them I'd sent you." He loves eating; he spent half an hour describing the lunch he used to have at the udupi mess every afternoon. On thursdays, they make heavenly chiroti. He is 86 years old, his wife died in a boat mishap 60 years back and he's still in love with her. He used to work for the Karnataka State Transport and Rajnikanth worked for him - "He's a nice boy and is doing well. God bless him."On The Plethora Of Communication Media
- Engagement: The extent to which a particular medium allows for community participation, allows for people to voice their views and is inclusive of the world. Social networks like Facebook are designed to be very engaging starting from their 'pokes' to their social games. On the other hand, blogs are more about commentary than equal participation.
- Bandwidth: How much effort is it to voice your opinion. Twitter is the easiest - you don't have to think beyond 140 characters and you can do it by simply sending a text message. Creation of a wikipedia article, at the other end of the spectrum, is a lot more effort.
- Signal To Noise Ratio: How easy is it to find the exact information that one is looking for. Wikis and blogs are great at this where as social networks are pretty abysmal.
- Synchronicity: How 'real-time' is the mode of communication. Chatting is as close to real-time as we can get with all the people involved online at the same time.
- Trust: Almost all communication media are a means of providing information. How trustworthy are these sources. Now, i separate trust from reliability. You can trust that a friend of facebook gives you a honest opinion of a product you are looking to buy, but you might not necessarily rely on his opinion. My scale of trust is based on a two factors: Is something provided by a group of experts and validated over time (like wikipedia / groups) or is it coming from close friends (like social networks); both of these are fairly trustworthy.
- Serendipity: What is communication without a little fun. A lot of the joy in social networking is derived from chancing upon a video or photograph that you liked.
- The standard deviation of email and groups is the least. They do a decent job at most things and are not the best way to communicate at any. It is also why they are still so prevalent - you can get by.
- The highest standard deviation is for Twitter and chat. They are great a few things and completely terrible at a few others. If you have ever been part of a live chat with more than 5 people or if you have had to navigate through a river of ridiculous tweets, you know the pain.
- As one can tell, there is still a lot of scope for improvement in the way we communicate and exchange information online (the highest score is only 2/3rd of the maximum possible).
I, then, decided to categorize the different types into 'old' and 'new'. I considered blogs, wikis, email, groups and chat as 'old media' and twitter, facebook and buzz as 'new media'. Here's what i found by taking averages (the larger the number, the better):
Photographing The Moon
The human eye is incredible because it can discern ranges in exposure that are beyond the capability of today's cameras. You look at the moon and at once, you can see the details within the moon (the rabbit on the moon) and the glow around it. Cameras fare miserably at this. At normal exposure, all you get is a washed out moon with a little glow around it. Underexpose it and you get great details within the moon, but all the glow around it is lost. Overexpose it and the glow is radiant, but there are no details at all. A simple image search will show you what i am talking about.
Yesterday, apart from being a blue moon, the moon was also at its biggest and brightest for the year. I wanted to photograph it as close as possible to how the human eye sees it. Knowing this was impossible with one shot, i set up my tripod and captured multiple shots of the moon at different exposures. My assumption was that once i was done, i could simply use a HDR creation software (like qtpfsgui), combine the images and get the perfect exposure. It was only after i got the images on the computer that a fairly obvious thing struck me. The earth moves. And fast. All the images had the moon at slightly different positions; these differed by mere pixels, but that was sufficient to completely confuse the software.
To save me time and accommodate for my lack of patience, I settled in on two images. One was made at -5EV exposure and the other at +4EV, with all other settings the same. The first image got the details within the moon and the second one got the glow fairly well. I used GIMP to create two separate layers with these images and lined them one on top of the other. Finally, i adjusted the exposure of this composite image the best i could, in aperture.
Here it is:
Next stop, photographing the moon with the stars!
The iDream
This isn't a post reviewing the iPad. Quite frankly, all i have seen are screenshots of the device. This isn't a post ridiculing the obnoxious name or lamenting the non-existence of multitasking, a camera or two, support of flash or your favorite proprietary protocol. It isn't about how pretty it is, the plethora of applications or the upcoming ebook store and its comparison to the Kindle. This isn't about its comparison with netbooks or other handheld computing devices. This isn't about the price and this isn't about how you cannot use it on an airplane (really. see 'environmental requirements').
Up Above The World So High
BR Hills
Trees of various hues, swaying to the summer songs of the birds, stand in a guard of honour as you enter. Turn your gaze upwards and little streaks of joyous colour whiz past, linger long enough to earn your gasp and become a blur of vividness yet again. Heaven? maybe not, but it certainly comes close.
Take a walk in the woods and the sea of green is punctuated with the effulgent colours of the elusive butterflies that captivate you the moment you set your eyes on them. Trek to the top of the hill in the early morning and witness the halo of mist around the other hills, which descends as rapidly as the sun rises in the sky. In the night, the innumerable stars beaming down on you like diamonds carelessly strewn on a velvet carpet will take your breath away.You feel so insignificant when you are in the company of such unbearable beauty.
Trek through the jungle. If you are lucky, you will notice the fleeting glimpse of the spotted deer or the glaring stare of the extremely curious sambar deer. If you are not, you will hear only the hoofbeats or perhaps encounter the great indian gaur boring down on you. Any short trip will be incomplete without a glimpse of the several exotic birds - from the scary crested hawk-eagle to the incredibly attractive black headed oriole, from the magnificent racket-tailed drongo to the innocent looking brown hawk owl.
My advice to everyone planning a weekend trip - Don't come here. Its an addiction which will leave you with severe withdrawal symptoms when you quit.
Butterflies In Monochrome
Shooting butterflies is always fun. Shooting butterflies in black and white is even more fun. You get the opportunity to explore the shape of the perch, the texture of the wings, the contrasts and the camouflage. When you don't have the crutch of the mesmerizing colors of the creature, it forces you to be a little more creative. The shape of the butterfly becomes more noticeable and the the body patterns jump at you. You realize that nature is glorious even if you strip it of all its colors.At The End Of The Next Decade
The earth mover sputters to a halt just short of the tree under which the last remaining tiger is meditating in a bid to attain salvation, because it runs out of the final drop of diesel on the planet. The irony makes some people smile, some weep gently while the rest of us continue to honk in the piling traffic jam.








7 Comments